Books, Reading, Review
Comments 4


Sometime last year, I was sitting at home late one night and watching At the Movies with Margaret & David. For those people not familiar with the program, it’s basically two people (Margaret and David), reviewing current release or soon to be released films. Anyway, on their Cannes Film Festival special, they discussed a soon to be released film titled Lawless, based on the book The Wettest County in the World. I was immediately enthralled and promised myself that I would be watching the film as soon as it hit cinemas, which I did. And I LOVED IT! So naturally I had to read the book, which I have just done. And I enjoyed it. Perhaps not as much as the film, which is a shame but those damn liberties that Hollywood like to take really got to me in the film and I felt that it worked a little better. So what’s it all about?

The Wettest County in the World (now republished as Lawless) centres around three brothers in Franklin County, Virginia in the prohibition era – Howard, Forrest and Jack Bondurant. The book is written by Matt Bondurant, who is the grandson of Jack and is based on the true story of the three brothers and their ongoing battle with the law in the late 1920’s and into the 1930’s. Illegal liquor was a lucrative business in the prohibition era, but even when prohibition was lifted in 1933, there were still plenty of moonshiners around as most people still preferred to pay for the illegal stuff, than pay the taxed prices of legal alcohol. Just about everyone had illegal stills back then and the Bondurants were no exception. The local police generally turned a blind eye, but when the Commonwealth Attorney shows up with new law enforcers, the game changes completely. What was once a game for everyone becomes one that only the hardest can play and if you don’t win it, you’re likely to end up dead. The Bondurant Boys were bootleggers, brawler and “hardboiled sons of bitches”. When the lawmen are asking for money for safe passage throughout the county, the Bondurants are some of the only men who don’t pay up – no one bothered them before, so why should they pay now?

Matt Bondurant has an exciting family history and one that I am a little bit jealous of. While the book is based on true events, due to a lack of records, Bondurant has had to be a little creative with some parts. There are few accurate records from that time and Bondurant found himself relying on newspaper reports and accounts from people who knew his grandfather and granduncles at that time. The three brothers seemed to be very complex sort of men and are the most unlikely of heroes. It’s difficult not to like them – despite their poor reputations. While I may have preferred the film adaptation to the book, I’m sure if I had read the book first it would have been the opposite. But whether you watch the film or read the novel, you will find it difficult not to get completely involved in this story and wish that you had a family history as exciting and outlawish as this one.

RATING – 8 out of 10. The book was exciting and well written, but I constantly found myself comparing it to the film. I know I shouldn’t have done this, but I just couldn’t help myself.

WHO SHOULD READ IT lovers of history and anyone who loves a bit of shoot ‘em up gangster action.

WHO YOU’LL LOVE – my favourite was Forrest Bondurant. I think perhaps the fact that Tom Hardy portrayed him in the film may have swayed me a little, but for me he was the most interesting and complex of the brothers – on the screen and on the page.



  1. Sounds like quite an interesting read, one I might have to (eventually) look into! I think I might read it before seeing it though, or else the comparison will be impossible haha.


    • I would definitely recommend reading it before watching the film, otherwise I think you’ll find yourself a bit disappointed in the ending of the book. I would have read it before watching, but I couldn’t find a copy of the book before the movie came out. But having said that, I really liked being able to imagine the actors as the characters while I was reading.


    • The movie is definitely one of my favourites that I have seen in the last couple of years. I thought the soundtrack was pretty amazing too.
      I think the bits that are the same in the film and the book are the historically accurate parts, but the parts where they differed are obviously the bits that Bondurant had to use his imagination for and hence the writers of the film have used their imaginations too. I really did prefer those parts in the film. The end of the film was very different to the book (I mean the shootout on the bridge). It wasn’t at all like the book and I enjoyed the film ending so much more. It was more final and dramatic. I don’t think you’ll lose much by not reading the book.


Write Your Thoughts Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s